Arcadia CfP: Multispecies Intellectual History
Call for Papers
Collection: Multispecies Intellectual History
Deadline: 31 January 2025
Arcadia: Explorations in Environmental History, Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society
Curated by Eiko Honda, Global Studies, Aarhus University.
Visit here for further details.
The Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society and Eiko Honda (Aarhus University) call for papers under the theme of ‘Multispecies Intellectual History,’ to be published in the peer-reviewed, open-access journal Arcadia: Explorations in Environmental History. The CfP aims to create the new thematic collection of featured articles within the journal on events in environmental history understood through a multispecies intellectual history perspective.
While the turn towards the more-than-human has been a strong presence in disciplines like geography, anthropology, and literary studies for close to a decade, it has received little recognition by intellectual historians with a few, notable exceptions. In this light, the new field of multispecies intellectual history (MIH), proposed by the project Unearthing Multispecies Intellectual History, challenges the foundation of “intellectual” history. That is, the assumed superiority of the autonomous human mind and its ability to reason on its own.
MIH emerges in a post-European Enlightenment paradigm where historical ideas and thought acknowledge their corresponding influences from realms beyond society and reasoning; here, they open their embrace to emotion, sensations, physical matters, and nonhuman actors. While doing so, MIH discerns epistemologies that surface out of encounters among plural ontologies, cosmologies, and historicities of heterogenous cultures and natures across time and space beyond the modern West. This collection therefore actively pays attention to cases in various regions of the world at the crossroad of area studies—with understanding of local languages—and the environmental humanities. The diversity of environments, people, and organisms call for a diverse MIH. The importance of MIH follows from the epistemic injustices inherent to intellectual history’s own history. In the present context of planetary crisis and ecological collapse, we are faced with a heightened urgency to situate our historical inquiries in a decolonial commitment to pluralism. This means recognizing other ways of defining and understanding the human and the nonhuman, and deconstructing or widening what is defined as intellectual per se.
The multispecies intellectual history and its methodology is not yet singularly defined and fixed. It would be a field whose methodologies could morph and diverge much like how Shuvatri Dasgupta has discussed the potentiality of a “nonhuman intellectual history.”[1] As Donna Haraway reminds us, “we need stories (and theories) that are just big enough to gather up the complexities and keep the edges open and greedy for surprising new and old connections.”[2] This Arcadia collection of multispecies intellectual history opens the space of possibilities for uncovering such (hi)stories. Such a multispecies entanglement destabilizes the illusion of a dichotomized separation and hierarchies between humans and nonhumans. It recognizes the role of the nonhuman in different ways of understanding the world.
To do so, we may experiment with established and new methodologies to unearth, analyze, and theorize the epistemological process behind an “environmental” event situated in a specific historical context.
